Cryptocurrency blockchain technology: What is Proof of Work (PoW)?

Cryptocurrency blockchain technology: What is Proof of Work (PoW)?

When Bitcoin launched in 2009, its “consensus mechanism,” how its blockchain processes and verifies new transactions, was based on what is called “Proof of Work.” Since its inception, many other blockchains have arisen and some have taken a different approach to finding consensus called “Proof of Stake”.

Bitcoin is still the number one dog as the world’s largest cryptocurrency, but the second and most used coin, Ethereum, has finally given up its proof of work. After a lot of delays, and a huge amount of testing, the Ethereum blockchain has implemented “merging” and is now using Proof of Stake. So, what is the difference between the two compatibility mechanisms? Is one better than the other?

See also:

Proof that blockchain technology works

The benefit of blockchain technology, for Proof of Work and Proof of Stake, is that it It uses a shared and immutable ledger which is verified by many computer nodes which makes it decentralized. This creates improved security, greater transparency, and instant traceability, according to its advocates.

In proof of the blockchain working, Computer nodes compete with each other to take first place in solving complex mathematical puzzles to add a new block to the chain, and with it all the rewards.

In the case of Bitcoin “miners”, Those who operate powerful computers to solve puzzles, 6.25 bitcoins per block they have successfully mined. This amount will be halved Sometime in 2024 and will continue to do so until the maximum supply of 21 million is exhausted, roughly in the year 2140. Miners will then receive a transaction fee to maintain the network.

However, this competition between nodes means that Proof of Work requires massive amounts of energy to run those problem-solving computers. In the case of Bitcoin, Its consumption was slightly lower than that of Argentina. This was just one blow against blockchain technology and crypto assets leading to opposition to the technology’s broader adaptation.

Proof of ownership of blockchain technology

One selling point of adapting Proof of Stake through “merging” is that the switch will reduce its power consumption by 99.95 percent. according to digital worldEthereum, a website that tracks crypto power consumption, uses much less power than it did before “The Merge” but One transaction still has a carbon footprint equivalent to 10,794 Visa transactions or 812 hours of YouTube watching.

Proof of Stake eliminates the need for massive computations to add new blocks to the chain. While that, Those who have a stake in the network get to participate in the validation mechanism. The validators place a minimum bet of 32 Ether, the digital currency in the Ethereum blockchain, but the larger the stake, the better the chance of selection to verify that new blocks spread across the network are valid and thus the monetary reward that comes with it. But this will not necessarily preclude small participants as investors can commit their holdings in the pool of shares managed by stock exchanges.

Which is better, Proof of Work or Proof of Stake?

If your only concern is energy saving, Proof of stake is clearly head and shoulders above, but each has its own uses and does not solve the problems that have plagued cryptocurrencies and assets. Crypto is also in the crosshairs of government regulators Because it has been used for nefarious ends, deception and hacking have resulted in people Loss of more than 1 billion dollars Since the beginning of 2021, in addition to Highly volatile nature.

Proof of work is much slower than Proof of Stake. For example, Ethereum expects to perform up to 100,000 transactions per second after the transition as well as launch cortex chains. This is higher than just 30 transactions per second on the Proof of Work blockchain. but, Proof of Work is more secure and able to maintain a decentralized network.

Ethereum resists that proof-of-stake should make its own blockchain More secure by increasing the cost to the potential attacker by 51 percent. That’s when miners with a majority of control over the network can interrupt the registration of new blocks. Along the same lines, The honest chain can be collectively restored by the community if the attack overcomes the economic crypto defenses.

There is still concern that an Ethereum swap could happen Reduce their decentralized nature and direct more power to large companies. This in turn raises the specter that it will be easier for governments to put pressure on a staking service to comply with an order to censor certain transactions. Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, The largest US exchange that accounts for 14 percent of the total Ether pegged, he said that he It is preferable to close the company’s staking service from complying with any such default order.


#Cryptocurrency #blockchain #technology #Proof #Work #PoW

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *